Monthly Archives: June 2011
Saying Jumma mubarak proofs
saying jummah mubarak is it bidah
Is Greeting on Friday is biddah ?
==Refutation of this Jahil Funny Fatwa of Ahlul Biddah wahabi/salafis ==
Saying Jumma Mubarak Proofs from Sahih hadiths
According to biddah concept of Wahabis their birth is also bid’ah because they believe bid’at (innovation) is always bad they were also innovated in this Century so they Born Bidda’tis their own biddah concept prove it . Insha Allah we will Refute their Crap beliefs.
Now here is the refutation of his lame fatwa from quraan and hadees . . ..
Jummah means Friday and Mubarak means blessed.Totally it means ‘Jummah Mubarak’ that is blessed friday.So it isn’t any Bidah.Many times we wish each other to have a great/blessed day ,a very similar one.So,will you say it’s a bidah?…
In the name of Allah, the inspirer of truth. All praise is to Allah, Most Merciful and Compassionate,
Allah most high says “Allah and his angels send blessings on the prophet, o you who believe, send blessings on him and salute him with all respect.” [Qur’an, surah AL Ahzab 33:56]
The messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and give him peace) said “the one in whose presence I am mentioned and does not send blessings on me is a miser.” [reported by Tirmidhi, who declared it well and rigorously authenticated]. The meaning of sending blessings on the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)
Imam Bukhari wrote whole Chapter on Superiority of Blessed day Friday Check Online Source Vol 2 Book 31
Friday the blessed day in sahih hadiths
Sahih Bukhari,Volume 2, Book 13, Number 1:
Narrated Abu Huraira ra :
I heard Allah’s Apostle (Sallallahu alyhi wa sallam) saying, “We (Muslims) are the last (to come) but (will be) the foremost on the Day of Resurrection though the former nations were given the Holy Scriptures before us. And this was their day (Friday) the celebration of which was made compulsory for them but they differed about it. So Allah gave us the guidance for it (Friday) and all the other people are behind us in this respect: the Jews’ (holy day is) tomorrow (i.e. Saturday) and the Christians’ (is) the day after tomorrow (i.e. Sunday).”
- Note: In this sahih hadith itz said to celebration was compulsary on blessed day friday so that Allah subhana tala will gave us guidence. sahih hadiths proves even to celebrate and wahabis claim wishing jumma mubarak is biddah how funny.this is the strong refutation of wahabi lame mufti fatwa from sahih hadiths.
Sahih bukhari,Volume 2, Book 13, Number 51:
Narrated Abu Huraira R.A:
The Prophet (Sallallahu alyhi wa sallam) said, “When it is a Friday, the angels stand at the gate of the mosque and keep on writing the names of the persons coming to the mosque in succession according to their arrivals. The example of the one who enters the mosque in the earliest hour is that of one offering a camel (in sacrifice). The one coming next is like one offering a cow and then a ram and then a chicken and then an egg respectively. When the Imam comes out (for Jumua prayer) they (i.e. angels) fold their papers and listen to the Khutba.”
- Note angels stand at gate on friday prayer and write names of the persons specially for friday prayer not on other days. this proves friday is most blessed day and wishing to blessed day friday is haq as it does not harm or change any sunnah of religion .
Volume 3, Book 49, Number 861: (Sahih Bukhari)
,
Narrated Aisha R.A: Allah’s Apostle said, [“If somebody innovates something which is not in harmony with the principles of our religion, that thing is rejected.”
,
- Read it once again to understand that Islam is not an illogical religion, hence new innovations which are not in “Harmony” with the principles of religion will be Bidat al Dhalalah otherwise they will be Bidat al Hassanah.
Reference: Sunan Tirmidhi 50- BOOK OF EXEGESIS OF THE QUR’AN Chapter 6 About surah al-Maidah, Hadith no 415
Albani graded the above Hadith as Sahih in His TakhreejFriday is greater then Day of Sacrifice and Fast
Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) said, “Friday is the lord of days and the chief of them in Allah’s sight, being greater in Allah’s sight than the day of sacrifice and the day of breaking the fast. It has five distinguishing characteristics: on it Allah created Adam, on it Allah sent Adam to the Earth, on it Allah took Adam in death, it contains a time at which no one will ask for anything without Allah giving it, so long as he does not ask for anything unlawful, and on it the last hour will come. There is no angel near Allah’s presence, nor sky, nor earth, nor winds, nor mountains, nor sea which do not fear Friday.”
Reference: Sunan Tirmidhi Hadith no 410- Alim CD room SoftwareAlso Ibn Majah transmitted. Ahmad transmitted from Sa’d ibn Mu’adh.
All proofs are sahih authentic which proves permissibilityof saying ” jumma mubarak ” is haq not biddah
Fiqh and Imam A’zam Abu Hanifa raziAllah tala anhu
Imam A’zam Abu Hanifa, Imam Maalik, Imam Shaafi and Imam Ahmed bin Hambal (radi Allahu anhumul ajma’in) are the leaders of the four schools of Fiqh (Islamic Law).
“FIQH” is the Science of Islamic Law or Jurisprudence.
It refers to the collection and compilation of Islamic laws based on the Holy Quran and the Sunnah of Sayyiduna Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). These great Muslims devoted themselves to the task of developing the science of understanding Islamic Law and its practise.
Although they differed from each other, all the four great Imams had great respect for each other.
They were all teachers and pupils of each other for the common goal of enhancing their knowledge about Islam. All of them were unanimous on Aqa’ids (Islamic Beliefs). We, as Muslims, must respect the different Sunni schools of thought.
AND we also dont reinvent WHEEL .
AT what level are we ??
Most of us dont even understand Arabic
Most of US have not read the entire Quran with Tafseer and Shane Nuzool
Even tho all of us might have read we cant relate Masils on our own
Most of us have not read ANY of HADIS in its Authetic Form
We spend part of our time here Full time we are busy in Java or other worldy stuff …
AND yet we see People who read Translated QURAN and Hadis translated by United States(American) university and challenge these Scholars !!!!
Imam A’zam Abu Hanifa (radi Allahu anhu)
He was born in Kufa in Iraq in 80 A.H. He belonged to the pious period of the Taabi’ins (Successors of the Sahabas).
DIVINE MISSION
It is stated in a Hadith Shareef which Imam al-Harizmi reported from Sayyiduna Abu Hurayrah (radi Allahu anhumA) that Sayyiduna Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: “Among my Ummah, there will come a man called Abu Hanifa. On the Day of Resurrection, he will be the light of my Ummah.” Another Hadith Shareef states: “In every century, a number of my Ummah will attain to high grades. Abu Hanifa will be the highest of his time.”
These two Ahadith are recorded in “Durr al-Mukhtar.”
EARLY LIFE
While still in his youth, he met great Sahaba like Sayyiduna Anas bin Maalik,
Sayyiduna Sahl bin Saad
and Sayyiduna Abul Tufail Amir bin Wathilah (radi Allahu anhumul ajma’in).
Imam A’zam Abu Hanifa (radi Allahu anhu) was first brought up as a trader, but soon started taking deep interest in Islamic learning.
EDUCATION
He attended the lectures of Sayyiduna Hammad Basri (radi Allah anhu) in Fiqh and then began to study the Hadith.
He learnt under great scholars in Kufa. In Basrah he studied under two great Taabi’ie scholars who had learnt Hadith under the Sahaba.
In Makkatul Mukarammah and Madinatul Munawwarah, he learnt under
Sayyiduna Ata bin Abi Rabah and
Sayyiduna Ikramah (radi Allahu anhuma).
In fact, Imam A’zam Abu Hanifa (radi Allahu anhu) had numerous teachers. Some historians say that he learnt Hadith from about 4 000 scholars.
Some of his famous teachers were: Sayyiduna Imam Baaqir,
Sayyiduna Imam Jafer Saadiq,
Sayyiduna Ali,
Sayyiduna Abu Hurayrah,
Sayyiduna Abdullah ibn Umar,
Sayyiduna Aqabah bin Umar,
Sayyiduna Safwaan,
Sayyiduna Jabir and
Sayyiduna Abu Qatadah (radi Allahu anhumul ajma’in).
AS a Teacher
When his teacher, Sayyiduna Hammad Basri (radi Allahu anhu) passed away,
Imam A’zam Abu Hanifa (radi Allahu anhu) was 40 years old and he began teaching.
He became very famous and travelled many places. Students from all over the Muslim world came to him to listen to his lectures, interviews and debates. Imam Maalik (radi Allahu anhu) also learnt under him.
When he was 56 years old, Caliph Mansur came to power after the Ummayad dynasty was overthrown by the Abbasids in 132 A.H.
Since Imam Abu Hanifa (radi Allahu anhu) opposed the Caliph’s ruthless killing of the Ahle Bait, he was arrested.
The Caliph offered the Imam the post of a Qaadi (Judge), but he refused.
The Caliph Mansur had him beaten with a stick 30 strokes. His feet bled. Caliph Mansur repented and offered Imam A’zam Abu Hanifa (radi Allahu anhu) 30 000 pieces of silver. The great Imam refused once more. He was imprisoned again and thrashed 10 more strokes every day.
PASSES AWAY
In the Month of Rajab 150 A.H., Imam A’zam Abu Hanifa (radi Allahu anhu) passed away while in Salaah. He had been poisoned by the orders of Caliph Mansur.
His Janaza Salaah was performed six times and each time 50 000 people took part. People continued to come and pray for him for 20 days after he was buried. He was 70 years old.
In 459 A.H. a Mazaar (Tomb) was built for him by the Seljuki ruler Alp Arsalan. He lies buried in a Tomb situated near Baghdad in Iraq.
73 fiqhs and Ahle Sunnat
“Awf ibn Malik reported that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) said,
‘The Jews split into 71 sects: one will enter Paradise and 70 will enter Hell. The Christians split into 72 sects: 71 will enter Hell and one will enter Paradise.
By Him in Whose hand is my soul, my Ummah will split into 73 sects: one will enter Paradise and 72 will enter Hell.’
Someone asked, ‘O Messenger ofAllah (Peace be upon him), who will they be?‘
He replied, ‘The main body of the Muslims (al-Jama’ah).’ Awf ibn Malik is the only one who reported this Hadith, and its isnad is acceptable.”
And in another version of this Hadith the Prophet (Peace be upon him) goes onto say that the saved sect, “…Are those who follow my and my Sahaba’s path”
(Tirmidhi, vol. 2, pg. 89)
Question :
so today let’s suppose there are 73 sections in Ummah let’s suppose you’re one section and i’m another and we both follow Quran we perform Namaz, we Fast, we pay Zakat, we’ve performed Hajj but the thing is we’re just different sections and just because of having different sections one of us two will enter JENNAH?
how’s it possible i mean both the sections followed the 5 Pillars of ISLAM and followed Quran but because of being different section one of em will get Hell and one will get JENNAH?
today we have too many different different sections i’ve seen em following the same thing but the thing is they’re sectioned, our Eemaan is same but our Aqayed are different.
Reply :
Actually Following Prophet peace be upon hims sayings is referred to as IMAN ..
If u negate anyone we Loose it,
IF we have any Kufriya beliefs we loose it..
EMAAN – is nothing but a set of AQAEEDS
(All that is in QURAN and HADIS )
Now When HADIS does explicitly show their destination as HELL ,- question is HOW inspite of KALIMA and namaz etc..
HOW – should be for the sake of Curiosity and knowledge NOT due to DOUBT that challenges the Statement of HADIS , this is the way i see it
Quran does say about such people who did exist even then
who read Kalima , read namaz, participated in jihad , did every thing what Muslims then did …
Surah Al MUNAFIKOON
1. When the hypocrites come to you, they say, ‘we bear witnesses you are undoubtedly the Messenger of Allah, and Allah knows that you are His Messenger. But Allah bears witness that the hypocrites are most surely liars.
2. They have taken their oaths as shield and they kept back from Allah’s way, undoubtedly, they are doing most vile works.
3. This is so because, they believed with their tongues, then disbelieved with their hearts, therefore a seal has been set over their hearts, so now they understand nothing.
here Allah is saying in QURAN these people who read KALIMA , NAMAZ etc , Allah will never forgive them. Undoubtedly, Allah guides not the disobedients.
so now Since from Quran we know even after kalima ,namaz, roza one can be routed for hell…..
so this Rules out the impossibility which you were asking , hadis does Align with QURAN ..
we now have to Align our understanding …
but we were not left in Dark
…Are those who follow my and my Sahaba’s path
what was Sahabas way of IMAN
When Abubakar Siddique raziallhutalanhu was asked what do u say about some one who says he traveled from Madina to Masjid e Aqsa and in short span ???
he asked who said this ?
Your Friend
I testify that this is true, and even if he says he went to skies and returned I testify that ..
When Umer e Farooqe raziallhutalanhu was approached by 2 , one with Muslim name and other jew with a case , to make a Judgement .
jew said before you we had been to Prophet peace be upon him he gave judgment in my favour , he says prophet is rehmatullialameen so to please you he gave judgment in you favor hence we came to YOU
Umer e farooque Raziallhutalanhu Chopped the head of Munafik… ( he did read kalima etc)
Allah Supported by sending QURAN in favor of his judgment …
and IBLIS
does believe Allah as ONE ,
he did worship for very long time
he had knowledge
SO what set him to HELL
he did not Accept the STATUS of PROPHET
we came 1400 years later, it is our quest to find out that 1 Sect from the MAP of indications we have … we have to focus on treasure of IMAN and the directions of prophet peace be upon him , loyal to Allah and Loyal to prophet peace be upon him ..
NOT to 72 sects who are destined for Hell
Understanding Sects
Why cant Muslims be one.
If we get divided in sects that breaks our unity makes us weak against enemies of Islam
Let people who fight for sects do what they have been doing being a common man let me follow all sects or be neutral for all.
Our prophet has given us 1 Islam why shud we divide it.
To start with lets see who is a Muslim
Kalmaa, Namaz, roza, haj, zakat are the five pillars of Islam a muslims life cycle begins with Accepting Allah and his prophet sallalahualihiwasallam and then goes on.
Kalma : when we say we Accept Allah is one and follow the prophet sallalla hualihiwasallam does it mean
Can one say yes I accept All but I will read namaaz the way I like, when I like ?
Or say any other modification to shariyaat, disrespects prophets believe in them but does not respect them ?
.
If the answer is NO read further on..
So we accept complete set of Shariyat
If a person who has this kind of Iman is not a Muslim even tho his birth certificate might say hes a muslim his name may indicate hes a muslim,he might be regarded as a priest amongst muslims.
If the hadis by our holy prophet sallalahualihiwasallam refers only 1 out of 72 is jannati , a very simple understanding is others are a gatepass to HELL.
NOW SHOULD WE NOT BE CONCERNED who are those people as this is purpose of life to die as a MUSLIM. So these sects in other words are deviations from the main stream iman and hence were tagged with names for Identification.
Few Major sects as called now
SHIA
SUNNI
WAHABI ( Deobandi, tableghi jamat, Ahle hadis)
Qadiyani etc
Next step should be to find out what are the differences between these sects.
NOTE :AS PER EVERY SECT THE OTHERS ARE DISBELIEVERS so there is no neutral place.
This is a cornering situation for a layman. or those who WANT TO be neutral
Once we Study each Aspect of sects … we can judge who is right if the GRACE is on our Side…
NOTE : Only those differences matter which are in Fundamentals of Deen – without which or Due to Which one becomes KAFIR
NOW .. MASSES dont care and Lack knowledge, When the enemies saw they send in their Agents in DISGUISE ..
WHO WOULD THEY SELECT to be a SPY and Destroy ISLAM from Within , create sects ??
would they choose a fool – or a intelligent but Cunning guy
one who cannot speak in public – or best Orator
one who knows NOTHING of ISLAM – or the one who knows ISLAM and also knows what people don’t know about ISLAM
IF WE can understand this .. selection we will not fall FANS to TV Orators or follow FAME …
YES AGREED to that fact that getting knowledge or RESPONSIBLE for LACK of Knowledge is WE MUSLIMS , this was Vacuum of knowledge was used AGAINST us
The ISLAMIC University system was Stopped ..
Deen and Worldy studies were separated – THIS CONSPIRACY they named ad MR. and MULLA still recorded in books of British Library
they knew generations further this will lead to Scholars as poor and Everybody else Wealthy
which will make Scholars dependent on Followers !!!
Refutation of wahabism(Lord of shirk)
LORD OF SHIRK
Lord of Shirk
Mu-hammed bin Abdul Wahab Najdi at-Tamimi
They (Adam and eve) did “Shirk” in obedience (to Allah), but not in worship
[Ibn Abdul Wahab al-Najdi in Kitab ut Tawheed, Page No. 57-58]
In English translation of Kitab at-Tawhid it says in Footnote:
The above quoted Hadith is said to be “WEAK”.
Hafiz Ibn Kathir (rah) and Al-Albani ranked it weak “DA’IF” (Publisher) [Page No. 157]
Now Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi had himself become Mushrik for attributing Shirk towards Adam (a.s)
as Ibn Kathir and Albani has proven it by declaring the report as “DA’IF”!
Admirers of Najdi are ignoring the clear shirk which Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi himself did, so I would like to reveal another Jahalat of this pseudo reviver from his so called acclaimed book:
He made a whole chapter title as:
باب: التسمي بقاضي القضاة ونحوه
Translation: To be named as “Qadhi ul Qudhaat”
(Judge of Judges)
And then he used the hadith of “: رجل تسمى ملك الأملاك، لا مالك إلا الله” i.e. Prophet (Peace be upon him) forbade the name “Malik al-Amlak (King of the Kings) because there is no King but Allah ”
[Kitab at-Tawhid, Page No. 54]
This is again height of ignorance shown by this pseudo self-assumed reviver of deen. By Including Qadhi ul Qudhaat into category of Shirk he has declared overwhelming Muhaditheen as “Mushrikeen”
For the time being I will show 1 proof.
Imam al-Hakim (rah) right in mentioning the chain of narrators said:
أخبرني قاضي القضاة أبو الحسن محمد بن صالح
Translation: Narrated by “QADHI UL QUDHAAT (Judge of Judges)” Abul Hasan Muhammd bin Salih… [Mustadrak al Hakim (3/580)]
So this Najdi Ibn Abdul Wahab was not only ignorant in sciences of Quran and Hadith but even simple Arabic.
He attributies lie to Prophet by forging hadith
As they are afraid to reply so I will add third blunder made by Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi in same book Kitab at-Tawhid …this is now total operation of that pseudo Mawhid.
Analysis # 3: On Page no.52 of Kitab at-Tawhid towards the end, Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi quotes:
Ahmed reports that Tariq bin Shihab narrated that Allah’s Messenger (Peace be upon him) said: ….(till the end of hadith, please note that even in matn of hadith he added: How was that possible “O MESSENGER OF ALLAH”)
Then he gave reference as “(Ahmed)” on next page…Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi attributed lies to Prophet as this hadith is not narrated by Prophet (Peace be upon him), secondly he hypocritically changed the matn (content) of hadith itself to somehow put Prophet inside, third and he also gave wrong reference as this hadith does not exist in Musnad Ahmed as well, so Najdi cooked up 2 lies!
(a) Attributing hadith to Prophet (Peace be upon him) and also forging the matn of hadith to somehow strengthen personal viewpoint.
(b) Referencing it to Ahmed although it is not present in Musnad Ahmed.
Now according to Sahih hadith a person who attributes a lie to Prophet (Peace be upon him) will occupy his seat in hell fire.
—————————————
Sahih Bukhari,Volume 8, Book 77, Number 611:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet said, “Adam and Moses argued with each other. Moses said to Adam. ‘O Adam! You are our father who disappointed us and turned us out of Paradise.’ Then Adam said to him, ‘O Moses! Allah favored you with His talk (talked to you directly) and He wrote (the Torah) for you with His Own Hand. Do you blame me for action which Allah had written in my fate forty years before my creation?’ So Adam confuted Moses, Adam confuted Moses,” the Prophet added, repeating the Statement three times.
—————————–
Mu-hammed ibn Abdul-wahhab Najdi
Attributed Shirk to Adam and Hawwaa
he said:
Kitaab At-Tawheed, Chapter: 48
[(Allah , says: ” It is He Who created you from a single being and made from it its mate, in order that he might dwell with her. When he united with her [in intercourse], she bore [i.e. becomes pregnant with] a light burden and she continued to carry it. When she grew heavy, they both prayed to Allah, their Lord: “If You give us a righteous child, good in every respect, we vow we shall be of the grateful ones.” But when He gave them a righteous child, they ascribed to others a share in that which He had given them: But Allah is Exalted High above the partners they ascribe to Him” (Qur’an 7:189-190 )
Allah , Most Glorified, Most High, informs us in these verses that He created mankind from a single human being, Adam (as ) and that He created from him a wife, Hawwa`, in order that they might live together in peace and harmony and that He created in them the desire for sexual intercourse and made it permissible to them, in order that they might enjoy complete stability and repose and that their progeny might continue to multiply. And when she became pregnant, they both called upon Allah , asking Him to give them a healthy, strong, righteous child and swearing that if He did so, they would be eternally be grateful to Him. But when Allah answered their supplications and gave them that which they had requested, they named him `Abdul Harith, thus ascribing others as partners with Allah ; and Allah is far above that which they attributed to Him. )]
وجاء في الكتاب الأصلي :
قول الله تعالى: ( فلما آتاهما صالحاً جعلا له شركاء فيما آتاهما ) (114) الآية.
قال ابن حزم: اتفقوا على تحريم كل اسم معبَّد لغير الله؛ كعبد عمر، وعبد الكعبة، وما أشبه ذلك، حاشا عبد المطلب.
وعن ابن عباس رضي الله عنه في الآية قال: لما تغشـاها آدم حمـلت، فأتاهما إبليس فقال: إني صاحبكما الذي أخرجتكما من الجنة لتطيعاني أو لأجعلن له قرني أيل، فيخرج من بطنك فيشقه، ولأفعلن ولأفعلن ـ يخوفهما ـ سِّمياه عبد الحارث، فأبيا أن يطيعاه، فخرج ميتاً، ثم حملت، فأتاهما، فقال مثل قوله، فأبيا أن يطيعاه، فخرج ميتاً، ثم حملت، فأتاهما، فذكر لهما فأدركهما حب الولد، فسمياه عبد الحارث فذلك قوله تعالى: ( جعلا له شركاء فيما آتاهما ) (115) رواه ابن أبي حاتم.
وله بسند صحيح عن قتادة قال: شركاء في طاعته، ولم يكن في عبادته. وله بسند صحيح عن مجاهد في قوله: ( لئن آتيتنا صالحاً ) (116) قال: أشفقا ألا يكون إنساناً، وذكر معناه عن الحسن وسعيد وغيرهما.
This story is untrue, for example:
– Ibn Katheer said in his tafseer (Arabic version 2/287) :
( These effects received from the people of the Book -Jews and Christians-)
هذه الآثار متلقاة عن أهل الكتاب
– Ibn Hazm said (Al-fisal) :
( the story that is attributed to Adam which said that he when Allah answered his supplications and gave him that which he had requested and he named his son “Abdul Harith”, this story is a fabricated Myth.
and this story don’t have any correct origin , but it descended from heaven about Mushriks )
وهذا الذي نسبوه إلى آدم من أنه سمى ابنه عبد الحارث خرافة موضوعة مكذوبة… ولم يصح سندها قط، وإنما نزلت الآية في المشركين على ظاهرها
– Al Qurtubi said (سورة الأعراف -آية190) :
(this story Do not count it who has a heartلا يعوِّل عليها من كان له قلب)
—————————————-
Shaykh Sulayman(ra)
The brother of Mu-hammed ibn abdul wahab Najdi, was also opposed to his mission. He refuted him emphatically with verses of the Holy Qur’an and Ahadith, since the refuted one (i.e. Mu-hammed Ibn ‘Abdul-Wahhab Najdi) would not accept other than these two sources.
Nor would he consider the sayings of earlier or later scholars, whoever they may be, other than Ibn Taymiyyah and his student Ibn al-Qayyim (al-Jawziyyah).
This is because Mu-hammed Ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhab Najdi considered their sayings to be explicit verses which do not accept interpretation and he used them in debate with he people, despite the fact that the sayings of these two figures contradicted what he understood.
Shaykh Sulayman named his refutation against his brother:
Fasl-ul-Khitab fi ar-Radd ‘ala Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhab
(The Empathic Speech on the Refutation of Mu-hammad Ibn ‘Abdul-Wahhab)
However, Allah protected Shaykh Sulayman from the evil and deception of his brother, whose great influence spread threat far and wide. This is because if one contradicted and refuted him, and he was unable to kill him openly, he would send someone to assassinate him in their bed or in the market-place at night, since he judged whoever contradicted him to be a blasphemer and legalized their killing.
It has been said that an insane person lived in the town and among his habits was to strike whoever he came across, even with a weapon.
Mu-hammad Ibn ‘Abdul-Wahhab Najdi gave an order that this insane man was to be given a sword and admitted to the mosque where his brother Shaykh Sulayman sat alone.
When Shaykh Sulayman saw him, he was afraid. The insane man threw the sword from his hand and said, “O Sulayman, do not be afraid; you are of those who are saved.”
Rain Clouds over the Graves of the Hanbalis, page 275
published by the so-called
“Imam Ahmad Bookshop”
This book was published originally by the Wahabis in Arabic.
There is a chapter in it about Shaykh ‘Abdul Wahhab and his deviant son Mu-hammad ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab.
The Wahabis did not realise that the text was critical of Mu-hammad ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab and have subsequently altered it in a more recent edition.
——————————————
Shaykh Sulaymaan Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab
Q. Another question is that it is well known that Sulayman Ibn Abd al-Wahaab rejected his brothers misguidence and wrote against the wahaabi regime. A salafi brother pointed out that he repented from going against his brother before he died. I needed some clairty on that issue too.
Bakr Abu Zayd and `Abd al-Rahman `Uthaymin, the two Wahhabi editors of Ibn Humayd al-Najdi’s Hanbali bio-dictionary _al-Suhub al-Wabila `ala Dara’ih al-Hanabila_ (Risala ed. 2:679), consider the report of that repentence spurious and say there is no proof that Sulayman ever changed his mind.
What is agreed upon is that when his father died, Sulayman ibn `Abd al-Wahhab ibn Sulayman al-Tamimi al-Najdi (d. 1210?) succeeded him as qadi of Huraymila’ in 1153. Twelve years later, in 1165, Sulayman led the people of that town and `Uyayna, another nearby town, in a rebellion against his brother Mu-hammed ibn `Abd al-Wahhab ibn Sulayman’s (d. 1207) Wahhabi forces which lasted for three years.
The towns were overrun in 1168 and Sulayman fled to Sudayr where he was left alone. Twenty years later he was brought against his will to Dir`iyya, the capital of his brother and `Abd al-`Aziz ibn Mu-hammed ibn Sa`ud, where Mu-hammed kept him under a sumptuous but strict house arrest until they both died.
Sources: Ibn Bishr, _`Unwan al-Majd bi-Tarikh Najd_ (years 1165 and 1168); _Tarikh Ibn La`bun_ (year 1190); Ibn Ghannam, Tarikh (1:142), all as cited in the marginalia of Ibn Humayd, al-Suhub al-Wabila(2:678-679).
It is in the context of his losing battle against his brother that Sulayman wrote his famous book against the Wahhhabi sect titled:
Fasl al-Khitab min Kitab Allah wa-Hadith al-Rasul (salla Allahu `alayhi wa-Sallam) wa-Kalam Uli al-Albab fi Madhhab Ibn `Abd al-Wahhab
(“The Final Word from the Qur’an, the Hadith, and the Sayings of the Scholars Concerning the School of Ibn `Abd al-Wahhab”),
Also known as:
al-Sawa`iq al-Ilahiyya fi Madhhab al-Wahhabiyya
(“The Divine Thunderbolts Concerning the Wahhabi School”)
This book is among the first and earliest refutations of the Wahhabi sect in print, consisting in over forty-five concise chapters spanning 120 pages that aim to show the divergence of the Wahhabi school, not only from the Consensus and usûl of Ahl al-Sunna wal-Jama`a and the fiqh of the Hanbali Madhhab, but also from their putative Imams, Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn al-Qayyim on most or all the issues reviewed.
The biographer of the Hanbali School, Ibn Humayd al-Najdi (1236-1295) said in al-Suhub al-Wabila `ala Dara’ih al-Hanabila_ (2:675-679 §415):
The Fasl/Sawa`iq received the following editions:
1st edition: Bombay: Matba`a Nukhbat al-Akhbar, 1306/1889. 2nd edition: Cairo (date?). 3rd edition: Istanbul: Ishik reprints at Wakf Ihlas, 1399/1979. 4th edition: (Annotated) Damascus, 1420/1999.
The claim that Sulayman repented apparently originates under the pen of the contemporary literary historian of Arabia, `Ali Jawad Tahir in his eight-volume history published in Baghdad in the Fifties, Tarikh al-`Arab qabl al-Islam (‘Pre-islamic History of the Arabs’) 7:227. What gave this claim circulation is its endorsement by the Syrian historian Nur al-Din al-Zirikli (d. 1410/1990) in his much more famous biographical dictionary al-A`lam (3:130).
Al-Zirikli says in his snippet on Sulayman ibn `Abd al-Wahhab:
‘Sulayman ibn `Abd al-Wahhab: the brother of the Shaykh and leader of the reformist revival Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Wahhab. His brother opposed him in the Call (al-da`wah) and wrote epistles voicing this [opposition], among them _al-Radd `ala man Kaffara al-Muslimin bi-Sababi al-Nadhri li-Ghayr Allah_ (‘Refutation of Him Who Pronounced Apostasy against the Muslims for Vows to Other than Allah’) in Baghdad’s Awqaf archives, manuscript 6805. Then he abandoned his position and proclaimed he was sorry. He authored an epistle to that effect, in print. [FOOTNOTE:] Al-Kashif by Talas (p. 126-127) [a catalogue of manuscripts] which misattributes to him the book al-Tawdih `an Tawhid al-Khallaq. See also the periodical al-`Arab (7:227).’
The latter is a sourcing mistake and elsewhere al-Zirikli shows that he means `Ali Jawad’s book Tarikh al-`Arab rather than the periodical, as the latter obviously requires a different type of sourcing than volume and page number.
There are many problems with the above claim in addition to its being rejeted by the Wahhabis themselves as already mentioned:
1. Why does the author of the claim not cite the title of the supposed pro-Wahhabi ‘repentence epistle’ of Sulayman and who printed it and where?
2. Why is there no record of this supposed pro-Wahhabi position of Sulayman even among the Wahhabis? If he had really authored such a book one would expect the many supporters of the Wahhabi movement to have made sure it never got lost to the Muslim world but, on the contrary, no one ever heard of it other than an Iraqi literary historian and the Syrian biographer who cites him.
3. Why does the great bio-bibliographer `Umar Rida Kahhala not mention any such pro-Wahhabi recanting in his entry on Sulayman ibn`Abd al-Wahhab in his much more detailed eight-volume Mu`jam al-Mu’allifin (‘Dictionary of Authors’), other than Sulayman’s known anti-Wahhabi work?
4. The style of Sulayman’s anti-Wahhabi epistle typifies staunchness and a systematic refutation style with complete mastery of the Usul and `Aqida literature that a Hanbali debater is expected to possess. He also states that he waited eight years before deciding to speak out against the deviations of his little brother’s followers. It is unlikely that he would then back up and change his mind.
5. In 1995 the Jordanian Wahhabi, Mashhur Hasan Salman published in Ryadh a 2-volume work he titled Kutubun Hadhdhara al-`Ulama’u Minha_ (‘Books the Ulema [supposedly] Warned Against’), a ‘Salafi’ equivalent of the Vatican’s Index Librorum Prohibitorum, a guide listing books that the Roman Catholic Church forbade its members to read (except by special permission) because they were judged dangerous to faith or morals. He included Sulayman ibn `Abd al-Wahhab’s _Fasl/Sawa`iq_ in his pompous censorship manual. To us, of course, the fact that Salman includes Sulayman ibn `Abd al-Wahhab’s classic refutation in his index is in fact a thumbs-up and a proof that it is a Sunni book. The point, however, is that Salman makes no mention of a supposed repentence of Sulayman nor of his supposed pro-Wahhabi book. If there had truly been such a repentence and book he would have not missed it nor would he have omitted mentioning it.
The above are internal and external circumstancial evidence that Sulayman ibn `Abd al-Wahhab never changed his anti-Wahhabi position nor authored a pro-Wahhabi epistle.
A selected chronology of other early condemnations of Wahhabism in print:
1. Shaykh Muhammad ibn Sulayman al-Shafi`i al-Kurdi al-Madani, said to be one of Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Wahhab’s former teachers, wrote a fatwa condemning the Wahhabi movement in general terms. It is reproduced at the end of Sayyid `Alawi ibn Ahmad al-Haddad’s Misbah al-Anam (1908 edition; see below) and is also found at the beginning of the Waqf Ihlas offset reprint of Sulayman IAW’s Sawa`iq.
2. Al-San`ani (d. 1182) the famous author of Subul al-Salam at first wrote Muhammad IAW a panegyric which he sent him. Then he changed his mind and wrote an epistle denouncing him titled _Irshad Dhawi al-Albab ila Haqiqat Aqwal Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Wahhab.
See on this Imam al-Kawthari’s Maqalat(article ‘IAW and Muhammad `Abduh’), al-Shawkani’s al-Badr al-Tali`, s.v. ‘Muhammad ibn Isma`il al-Yamani,’ and Siddiq Hasan Khan al-Qinnawji’s Abjad al-`Ulum, introduction, and his Taj al-Mukallal.
3. Al-Habib `Alawî ibn Ahmad al-Haddad, _Misbah al-Anam fi Raddi Shubah al-Najdi al-Bid`i al-Lati Adalla biha al-`Awamm_ (‘The Luminary of Mankind Concerning the Refutation of the Fallacies of the Innovator from Najd by which He Has Misguided the Common Public’ written 1216/1801 but long out of print!) of which I translated and published the introduction [see outline in a separate post] together with the translation of al-Sayyid Yûsuf al-Rifa`i’s _Advice to Our Brothers the Scholars of Najd_ (1420/1999);
4. Al-Sawi (d. 1241) in his Hashiya `ala al-Jalalayn for Surat 35:6 mentions the Wahhabis and refers to them as Khawârij. NOTE that this phrase and the word ‘Wahhabiyya’ was excised from all present-day editions of this Tafsir!
5. Ibn `Abidin (d. 1243) said the same in his famous Hashiya, Book of Iman, Bab al-Bughât.
6. The Mufti of Makka, Sayyid Ahmad Zayni Dahlan (d. 1304/1886) with several works:
al-Durar al-Saniyya fî al-Radd alâ al-Wahhabiyya (‘The Pure Pearls in Refuting the Wahhabis’) (Cairo, 1319 and 1347), Fitnat al-Wahhabiyya (‘The Wahhabi Tribulation’), and Khulâsat al-Kalâm fî Bayân Umarâ’ al-Balad al-Harâm(‘The Summation Concerning the Leaders of the Holy Land,’ whose evidence is quoted in full by al-Nabhânî in Shawâhid al-Haqq p. 151-177), the last two a history of the Wahhabi movement in Najd and the Hijâz.
7. Imam Ahmad Rida Khan (1272-1340) states in his Fatawa al-Haramayn (Waqf Ikhlas offset ed. p. 11-12):
‘As for the Wahhabis they are a misguided sect (firqa dalla) and volumes were compiled both in Arabic and other languages – declaring them heretics. Among them is the book of our teacher in Hadith, our Master `Allama Ahmad ibn Zaini Dahlan al-Makki ‘ Allah sanctify his secret titled al-Durar al-Saniyya fi al-Radd `ala al-Wahhabiyya. The best word ever said about them is that of the Mufti of al-Madinat al-Munawwara, Mawlana Abu al-Su`ud – Allah have mercy on all of them: {The devil has engrossed them and so has caused them to forget remembrance of Allah. They are the devil’s party. Lo! is it not the devil’s party who will be the losers’} (58:18-19).’
Al-Sawi al-Maliki adduced the same verse against them in his Hashiya on Tafsir al-Jalalayn.
—
What is known about him too, is that he invoked the ire of two of his prominent Shaikhs in Madina:
Shaikh Muhammad ibn Sulaiman al-Kurdi and Shaikh Muhammad Hayat al-Sindi.
Moreover, his father, Abdul Wahhab and his brother, Sulaiman ibn Abdul Wahhab vigorously expressed their opposition to his views. In fact his brother composed a work called “al-Sawaiq al-Ilahiyya fi al-Radd ‘ala al-Wahhabiyya” (Divine Flashes in the Refutation of the Wahhabis).
Shaikh Muhammad ibn Sulaiman al-Kurdi had the following to say:
“O Ibn Abdul Wahhab, I advise you, for the sake of Allahu Ta’ala, to hold your tongue against the Muslims…You have no right to label the majority of Muslims as blasphemers while you yourself have deviated from the majority of Muslims. In fact it is more reasonable to regard the one who deviates from the majority as a blasphemer than to regard the Muslims as a nation as blasphemers…”
—
The Wahhabites Ahle Hadith the Deobandis and Tabligh Jama’at – which has the Kitab al-Tawhid of Mu-hammed Abdul Wahhab Najdi as its founding inspiration – are also anathema to one another.
——————————-
The Divine Lightning
By Imam Sulaiman Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab,
Translated by
(Spire Publishing, 2011)
“…For the first time in English, the reader has a full historical and theological explanation of Salafi yyah. The author, Imam Sulaiman ibn `Abdul Wahhab, was the first to write about and ultimately fall victim to the movement. Anyone seeking answers – Muslim or not – needs to understand that this tribulation did not begin on a Tuesday in 2001, but in the mind of a false prophet more than 200 years ago.”
—————————————————-
The Wahhabi Tree
Qarn al Shaytaan
Horn of Satan
——–
SALAFIS EXPOSED
Who was Nasiruddin Albani Salafi?
Why a brother turned from Salafi to Hanafi [HD]
تكفير الوهابية الشنيع للدولة العثمانية !Wahhabism Exposed Eng Subs
Salafi(Wahabi) Scholar removed * Sahih Hadith * on Kissing Hands & Feet from Bukhari !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fls7kElvtJ8 kafir nalayak Islamic mask
kafir nalayak and his islamic mask by Dr. Ashraf Asif Jalali
Ibne Taymiyyah ka Sahaba per Shirk ka Fatwa-Wahabion ka Pagal Imam
Zakir Naik Conspiracy Against Quran e Azeem(1/3)
Zakir Naik Conspiracy Against Quran e Azeem(2/3)
Zakir Naik Conspiracy Against Quran e Azeem(3/3)
Zakir Naik is on Foot Prints of Qadiyani Dajjal-1/2
Zakir Naik is on Foot Prints of Qadiyani Dajjal-2/2
Zakir Naik Hatred for Prophet Muhammad (Salallaho aliayhay wasullam)-1/2
Zakir Naik Hatred for Prophet Muhammad Salallaho aliayhay wasullam 2/2
Wahabi Zakir Naik Insults Allah-Najdi Exposed
Zakir – Khal Nayak Ki Sarkar (Sallallaho Alaihi Wasallam) Ki Khuli Gustakhiyan – Nafseislam.Com 002
CHALLENGE TO DR ZAKIR NALAIK OF DR Ashraf ASIF JALALI.zakir nalayak exposed
wahabiyon ka shirk aor ahlehadison ka/jawab do 1.wmv
Who are the real Auxiliaries of Mushrik(Mushriko Ka Madadgar Kaun)?
Kitab ut Toheed me Ibne Abdul Wahab Najdi ke Gustakhi-AhleHadis Wahabi Shaitan Imam
Ibne Taymiyah ka Ambiya & Auliya ke Shan me Gustakhi aor Najd pe Salam-Wahabi Gustakho ka Imam
Najdi Bin Baaz Allah ka Gustakh-Ghair Muqalid fitny ka andha Imam
Gustakhe Nabi ko Ahle Hadis Najdi ulma ka Inam
Zakir Naik ka operation by Saudi Ulama-Jahil wahabi
Wahabi Zakir Naik Insults Allah-Najdi Exposed
Ibne Taymiyyah ka Sahaba per Shirk ka Fatwa-Wahabion ka Pagal Imam
Dead can hear from Graves -Proof from Quran and Sahih hadiths
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
And Salutations upon Prophet Muhammad, the Prophet of Mercy (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم)
There are several proofs from Quran and authentic hadiths that those muslims who are in graves and Prophets [Peace be upon them] can not only hear but even reply from the grave and also become a Waseela. It is proven from authentic hadiths that even Non muslims can hear in graves but do not have capability to reply.
Proof from Al Quran # 1
Quran states: So Salih left them, saying: “O my people! I did indeed convey to you the message for which I was sent by my Lord: I gave you good counsel, but ye love not good counselors!“(Quran 7:79)
.
Here Salih (a.s) is addressing his dead people who had already been destroyed, had dead not heard then Nauzobillah this ayah of Quran would have been illogical, secondly what is the meaning of Salih (a.s)’s address?
Tafsir Ibn Kathir states under this ayah
هذا تقريع من صالح عليه السلام لقومه، لما أهلكهم الله بمخالفتهم إياه، وتمردهم على الله، وإبائهم عن قبول الحق، وإعراضهم عن الهدى إلى العمى، قال لهم صالح ذلك بعد هلاكهم، تقريعاً وتوبيخاً، وهم يسمعون ذلك، كما ثبت في الصحيحين: أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم لما ظهر على أهل بدر،
Translation: These were the words of admonishment which Salih exchanged with his nation after “ALLAH HAD DESTROYED THEM” for denying Him and also becoming renegades against Him, rejecting to accept the Haqq (truth) plus giving preference to misguidance over guidance. Hadrat Salih (a.s) said these words after they were “DESTROYED AND THEY HEARD THE WORDS TOO” In relevance to this It is narrated in the 2 books of Sahih (i.e. Bukhari and Muslim) that the Messenger (saw) defeated the kufaar in Badr … [then Imam Ibn Kathir mentions the sahih hadith in which Prophet clearly said that they (dead) hear better than you (alive)
[Tafsir Ibn Kathir under 7:79]
Click here for Arabic source
Proof # 2 from Quran
Quran states: Lo! those who ward off (evil), when a glamour from the devil troubleth them, they do but remember (Allah’s Guidance) and behold them seers! (Quran 7:201).
Imam Ibn Kathir (rah) narrates under this ayah:.
أن شاباً كان يتعبد في المسجد، فهويته امرأة، فدعته إلى نفسها، فما زالت به حتى كاد يدخل معها المنزل، فذكر هذه الآية: { إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ ٱتَّقَوْاْ إِذَا مَسَّهُمْ طَـٰئِفٌ مِّنَ ٱلشَّيْطَـٰنِ تَذَكَّرُواْ فَإِذَا هُم مُّبْصِرُونَ } فخر مغشياً عليه، ثم أفاق فأعادها، فمات، فجاء عمر، فعزى فيه أباه، وكان قد دفن ليلاً، فذهب فصلى على قبره بمن معه، ثم ناداه عمر فقال: يا فتى
{ وَلِمَنْ خَافَ مَقَامَ رَبِّهِ جَنَّتَانِ }
فأجابه الفتى من داخل القبر: يا عمر قد أعطانيهما ربي عز وجل في الجنة مرتين..
Translation: A young boy used to do (a lot) of worship in Masjid, however one woman fell in love with him and she started to attract him towards herself until one day he got persuaded and came to her house, but he recalled this ayah: { Lo! those who ward off (evil), when a glamour from the devil troubleth them, they do but remember (Allah’s Guidance) and behold them seers}, he fainted right over there, when he recovered he remembered the ayah again and fainted once again but this time he passed away. After his death Sayyidna Umar (ra) met his father being saddened at his death, (the boy) was buried during night, Umar (ra) took his companions along and visited his grave, he prayed there and “Called the Boy” saying: Whosoever feared to stand in front of his Lord then there are 2 gardens for him! Voice came from the grave O (YA) Omar (ra) Allah has granted me both the gardens
[Tafsir Ibn Kathir,Under 7:201]
Click here for Arabic source
Proofs from Authentic Hadiths :
Hadith #1
“The Messenger of Allah spoke to the People (buried) in the Well saying: “Have you found out that what your Lord had promised you is true?” then someone exclaimed: “Are you calling out to the dead!” The Prophet replied: “You do not hear better than they do, except they do not respond.”
(Sahih Bukhari, Volume 2, Book 23, Number 452)
Hadith #2
Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) let the dead bodies of the unbelievers who fought in Badr (lie unburied) for three days. He then came to them and sat by their side and called them and said: O Abu Jahl b. Hisham, O Umayya b. Khalaf, O Utba b. Rab’ila, O Shaiba b. Rabi’a, have you not found what your Lord had promised with you to be correct? As for me, I have found the promises of my Lord to be (perfectly) correct. Umar listened to the words of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) and said: Allah’s Messenger, how do they listen and respond to you? They are dead and their bodies have decayed. Thereupon he (the Holy Prophet) said: By Him in Whose Hand is my life, what I am saying to them, even you cannot hear more distinctly than they, but they lack the power to reply. Then’he commanded that they should be buried in the well of Badr.
[Sahih Muslim, Hadith # 6869]
Note: Here the Prophet (Peace be upon him) said , even you cannot hear more distinctly than they , Hence it proves that even Kafirs who are Dead can hear more clearly then alive can or equally let alone be Muslims and Prophets (aleh islam).But Kafirs cannot reply back according to this hadith, Where as muslims have the ability to reply as proved above and will be proved further.
.Hadith #3
Narrated Ibn Shihab:These were the battles of Allah’s Apostle (which he fought), and while mentioning (the Badr battle) he said, “While the corpses of the pagans were being thrown into the well, Allah’s Apostle said (to them), ‘Have you found what your Lord promised true?” ‘Abdullah said, “Some of the Prophet’s companions said, “O Allah’s Apostle! You are addressing dead people.’ Allah’s Apostle replied, ‘You do not hear what I am saying, better than they.’
[Sahih Bukhari, Book 59, Number 360]
Hadith #4
Allah has declared it forbidden for the earth to eat the bodies of the prophets. So the prophets are living and they receive their sustenance
References
►Ibn Majah narrated this sahih (sound) hadith in his Sunan, b. of jana’iz (funerals) ch.65 (1:524#1636-7), b. of iqamat-us-salat was-sunnah fiha (establishing prayer and its sunnahs) ch.79 (1:345#1085);
► Abu Dawud, Sunan, b. of salat (prayer) 1:275 (#1047);
►Nasa’i, Sunan, b. of jumu’ah (Friday prayer) 3:92;
►Ahmad bin Hambal Musnad (4:8);
► Ibn Hibban, as-Sahih (3:191#910);
►Darimi, Sunan (1:307#1580);
► Ibn Khuzaymah, as-Sahih (3:118#1733);
►Ibn Abi Shaybah, al-Musannaf (2:516);
►Hakim, al-Mustadrak (1:278);
►Tabarani, al-Mu’jam-ul-kabir (1:217#589); and► Bayhaqi in as-Sunan-ul-kubra (3:249). Hadith #5 (Sahaba believed that they enjoyed the company of others after death)
Click Here to read more Proofs from Sahih hadiths on life of Prophets [aleh islam] in graves
Hadith #6,
Narrated Abu Sa’id Al-Khudri : Allah’s Apostle said, “When the funeral is ready (for its burial) and the people lift it on their shoulders, then if deceased is a righteous person he says, ‘Take me ahead,’ and if he is not a righteous one then he says, ‘Woe to it (me)! Where are you taking it (me)?’ And his voice is audible to everything except human beings; and if they heard it they would fall down unconscious.”
(Sahih Bukhari, Volume 2, Book 23, Number 462
,This shows that the Dead can not only hear us, but they are also aware of what is happening in this world. And their voice is audible to everything except human beings.
Hadith #7
The Prophet [salehalawaalihi wasalam] said :“My life is a great good for you, you will relate about me and it will be related to you, and my death is a great good for you, your actions will be presented to me (in my grave) and if I see goodness I will praise Allah, and if see other than that I will ask forgiveness of him (for you).”
References for above hadith:
►Qadi `Iyad cites it in “al-Shifa” (1:56 of the Amman edition)
► Suyuti said in his “Manahil al-safa fi takhrij ahadith al-shifa” (Beirut 1988/1408) p. 31 (#8):
►”Ibn Abi Usama cites it in his Musnad from the hadith of Bakr ibn `Abd Allah al-Mazni,
►al-Bazzar from the hadith of Ibn Mas`ud with a sound (sahih) chain.
►It is cited in Subki’s Shifa’ al-siqâm fi ziyarat khayr al-anâm
[The Healing of the Sick Concerning the Visit of the Best of Creation], where he mentions that Bakr ibn Abd Allah al-Mazini reported it, and Ibn al-Jawzi mentions it through Bakr and then again through Anas ibn Malik in the penultimate chapter of the penultimate section of al-Wafa, both huffaz without giving the isnad.
Ibn al-Jawzi statement on hadith
However, Ibn al-Jawzi specifies in the introduction of al-Wafa that he only included sound traditions in his book.
.
He also mentions the version through Aws ibn Aws: “The actions of human beings are shown to me every Thursday on the night of (i.e. preceding) Friday.”
.
►See also FatH al-Bâri 10:415,
►al-Mundhiri’s Targheeb wa al-Tarheeb 3:343, ►and Ahmad 4:484
The Prophet (salehalawaalihiwasalam) Said
“Whoever invokes blessings on me at my grave, I hear him, and whoever invokes blessings on me from afar, I am informed about it
References:
►Ibn Hajar says in FatH al-Bâri 6:379:
►Abu al-Shaykh cites it with a good chain (sanad jayyid),► Bayhaqi mentions it in Hayât al-anbiyâ with “ublightuhu” in the end
Hadith #9
Sahih Hadith states:
مَرَّ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ بِقُبُورِ الْمَدِينَةِ فَأَقْبَلَ عَلَيْهِمْ بِوَجْهِهِ فَقَالَ السَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ يَا أَهْلَ الْقُبُورِ يَغْفِرُ اللَّهُ لَنَا وَلَكُمْ أَنْتُمْ سَلَفُنَا وَنَحْنُ بِالْأَثَرِ
Sayyindina lbn Abbas narrated that Allah’s Messenger — passed by some graves of Madinah. He turned his face towards them, and said: Peace be on you, O people of the grave![ السَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ يَا أَهْلَ الْقُبُورِ] May Allah forgive us and you. You have gone before us and we are to follow.
[Sunan tirmidhi Chapter 59 Hadith # 1055]
Hadith #10
Narrated Abu Hurayra I heard the Prophet say: “By the one in Whose hand is Abu al-Qasim’s soul, `Isa ibn Maryam shall descend as a just and wise ruler. He shall destroy the cross, slay the swine, eradicate discord and grudges, and money shall be offered to him but he will not accept it. Then he shall stand at my grave side and say: Ya Muhammad! and I will answer him.
Reference:
►Ibn Hajar al-`Asqalani cites it in al-Matalib al-`aliya (Kuwait, 1393/1973)
►Abu Ya`la relates it with a sound (sahih) chain in his Musnad Volume No. 11, Page No. 462, Published by Dar ul Kutb al-iLmiyyah;
Hadith #11
ضَرَبَ بَعْضُ أَصْحَابِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ خِبَاءَهُ عَلَى قَبْرٍ وَهُوَ لَا يَحْسِبُ أَنَّهُ قَبْرٌ فَإِذَا فِيهِ إِنْسَانٌ يَقْرَأُ سُورَةَ تَبَارَكَ الَّذِي بِيَدِهِ الْمُلْكُ حَتَّى خَتَمَهَا فَأَتَى النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَقَالَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنِّي ضَرَبْتُ خِبَائِي عَلَى قَبْرٍ وَأَنَا لَا أَحْسِبُ أَنَّهُ قَبْرٌ فَإِذَا فِيهِ إِنْسَانٌ يَقْرَأُ سُورَةَ تَبَارَكَ الْمُلْكِ حَتَّى خَتَمَهَا فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ هِيَ الْمَانِعَةُ هِيَ الْمُنْجِيَةُ تُنْجِيهِ مِنْ عَذَابِ الْقَبْرِ
.
Sayyidina Ibn Abbas (RA) reported that one of the companions of the Prophet (SAW) pitched a tent on a grave. He did not know that there was grave. It was the grave of human beings, who recited surah al-Mulk (#67) to the end of it. He came to the Prophet (SAW) and said, “O Messenger of Allah (SAW), I pitched my tent over a grave without knowing that it was a grave. The man inside recited surah al-Mulk to its end.” The Prophet (SAW) said, “It is the rescuer. It rescues from punisment of the grave.”
Reference
► Chapter 9, Virtues of surah al-Mulk, Tirmidhi (2899)
.
Quran says Verily, you cannot make the dead to hear , nor can you make the deaf to hear the call, when they flee, turning their backs(27:80 and 30:52)
.
.
Answer : This verse has more of a methaphoric meaning, secondly it refers to the kufaar not muslims in this case
Next verse says: Nor can you lead the blind out of their error, you can only make to hear those who believe in Our Ayât, and who have submitted
[Quran 27:81 and 30:53]
this doesn’t only refute the argument regarding first verse which some put forward that dead cannot hear in any circumstances but also makes it clear that muslims can hear as Allah says himself in the next verse , you can only make to hear those who believe in Our Ayât,
now let us go and check various authentic tafsirs regarding this verse
.
Tafsir ibn e khateer
for verse 27:80/1 and 30:52/3 says
{ إِنَّكَ لاَ تُسْمِعُ ٱلْمَوْتَىٰ } أي: لا تسمعهم شيئاً ينفعهم، فكذلك هؤلاء، على قلوبهم غشاوة، وفي آذانهم وقر الكفر، ولهذا قال تعالى: { وَلاَ تُسْمِعُ ٱلصُّمَّ ٱلدُّعَآءَ إِذَا وَلَّوْاْ مُدْبِرِينَ وَمَآ أَنتَ بِهَادِي ٱلْعُمْيِ عَن ضَلالَتِهِمْ إِن تُسْمِعُ إِلاَّ مَن يُؤْمِنُ بِآيَاتِنَا فَهُم مُّسْلِمُونَ } أي: إنما يستجيب لك من هو سميع بصير، السمع والبصر النافع في القلب والبصيرة، الخاضعُ لله ولما جاء عنه على ألسنة الرسل عليهم السلام.
(Verily, you cannot make the dead to hear) meaning, you cannot cause them to hear anything that will benefit them. The same applies to those over whose hearts is a veil and in whose ears is deafness of disbelief. Allah says:
(nor can you make the deaf to hear the call, when they flee, turning their backs. Nor can you lead the blind out of their error. You can only make to hear those who believe in Our Ayat, so they submit (became Muslims).) meaning, those who have hearing and insight will respond to you, those whose hearing and sight are of benefit to their hearts and who are humble towards Allah and to the Message that comes to them through the mouths of the Messengers, may peace be upon them.[end]
Arabic link
http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?…0&LanguageId=1
From above it seems these verses are not for those in Grave even , its talking about non muslims in the world who don’t get hidaya and don’t listen to word of Allah with an open heart, whos Hearts are dead,
People quote these verses out of context without going into Authentic tafsirs or reading the next verse even,peace
Objection No:2 Regarding Quranic verse
Quran states: Nor are (alike) the living and the dead. Verily, Allâh makes whom He will hear, but you cannot make hear those who are in graves
[quran 35:22]
In above verse the first part is talking about Disbelievers and muslims when it comes to Nor are (alike) the living and the dead and Tafsirs will shortly prove it,
In the second part Allah says Verily, Allâh makes whom He will hear , this clearly indicated that whom Allah (swt) wills he can hear and its not impossible , its already proved from several hadiths that not only believers but even non muslims can hear better then living from the grave,
Tafsir Ibn Kathir on this verse
وقوله تعالى: { إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يُسْمِعُ مَن يَشَآءُ } أي: يهديهم إلى سماع الحجة وقبولها والانقياد لها. { وَمَآ أَنتَ بِمُسْمِعٍ مَّن فِى ٱلْقُبُورِ } أي: كما لا ينتفع الأموات بعد موتهم وصيرورتهم إلى قبورهم وهم كفار بالهداية والدعوة إليها، كذلك هؤلاء المشركون الذين كتب عليهم الشقاوة، لا حيلة لك فيهم، ولا تستطيع هدايتهم { إِنْ أَنتَ إِلاَّ نَذِيرٌ } أي: إنما عليك البلاغ والإنذار، والله يضل من يشاء، ويهدي من يشاء، { إِنَّا أَرْسَلْنَـٰكَ بِٱلْحَقِّ بَشِيرًا وَنَذِيرًا } أي: بشيراً للمؤمنين، ونذيراً للكافرين، { وَإِن مِّنْ أُمَّةٍ إِلاَّ خَلاَ فِيهَا نَذِيرٌ } أي: وما من أمة خلت من بني آدم، إلا وقد بعث الله تعالى إليهم النذر، وأزاح عنهم العلل؛ كما قال تعالى:
(Verily, Allah makes whom He wills to hear,) means. He guides them to listen to the proof and accept it and adhere it.
(but you cannot make hear those who are in graves.) means, `just as the dead as disbelievers and ended up in the graves, so too you cannot help these idolators who are decreed to be doomed, and you cannot guide them.’[end]
Click here for Arabic source of Above Tafsir
The above Tafsir doesn’t only seperat the hearing part of dead but says it explains that its talking about guidance and accepting the truth, not about hearing, its also an agreed and acceptable fact that dead cannot accept Islam once they are dead.
__________________
Proofs of building Shrines/Tombs of Prophets
Narrated ‘Urwa:
[end quote ]
وكانوا أولى بهم وبالبناء عليهم {لَنَتَّخِذَنَّ عَلَيْهِم} على باب الكهف {مَّسْجِدًا} يصلي فيه المسلمون ويتبركون
( Ibn Hajr al-‘Asqalani, Fath al-bari, vol. 3, p. 208)
Hadrat Umar (Ra) wish to get buried beside Tomb of Prophet(saw) in a Room
Al-Bukhari narrates in his Sahih, Book of Jana’iz:
When `Umar was stabbed he sent his son `Abd Allah with a message to `A’isha to “Ask her if I can be buried with my two companions,” that is, in her room, next to the Prophet and Abu Bakr. `A’isha replied: “I wanted the spot for myself, but I shall put him [`Umar] before me today.” It had been her habit that if a man from among the Companions asked her that spot she would always refuse. She herself gave the following instructions before her death: “Bury me with my lady-friends (the wives of the Prophet in al-Baqi`) [but do not bury me with the Prophet in the house, for I dislike to be held in reverence (inni akrahu an uzakka).” Ibn `Umar came back with the news, whereupon `Umar said: “NOTHING IN THE WORLD WAS MORE IMPORTANT TO ME THAN THAT RESTING-PLACE.” [Narrated by al-Bukhari in his Sahih.]
Why did Hadrat Umar (ra) wanted to get buried in a room and not outside , Why is Hadrat Abu Baker (Ra) buried in a Room , A tomb is also a room built around the grave ,and it proves its a sunnah
The Tomb of Aqah Karim (صلی اللہ علیھ وآلھ وسلم) is the greatest proof of this practice , Other tombs of Sahabas (Ra) were demolished by Al saud otherwise they too were present throughout history of islam.
Proof 3 of building of tombs around a grave
Hadiths proving tombs of 70 Prophets (as) Tomb
5769- وعن ابن عمر أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال:
”في مسجد الخيف قبر سبعون نبياً”.
رواه البزار ورجاله ثقات.
Narrated by Ibn Umar (RA) from Prophet (salallaho alaihi wasalam) who said: In (fi) the Mosque of al-Khayf there is Qabr of 70 Prophets (together)
Imam al Hafidh Ibn Hajr al Haythami (rah) said:
رواه البزار ورجاله ثقات
It is narrated by Al-Bazzar and all its narrators are “THIQA” (i.e. Hadith is absolutely sahih) [Majma az Zawaid Volume No.3, Page No.640 Bab fi Masjid al Khayf, Hadith #5769]
Proof 4 of building of tombs around a grave
Jesus Will Be Burried Next to our Prophet’s (may God bless him and grant him peace) Tomb
Jesus, son of Mary, will come down to the world… He will marry, . . . live for 45 years and then die. He will be buried with me [Mohammed] in my grave. Then I and Jesus, son of Mary, will stand up in one grave between Abu Bakr and `Umar. (Mishkat-ul-Masabih, 40:4)
Jesus will marry and have a child after he returns. After he dies, the Muslims will perform his funeral prayer and bury him at the Rauza-i-Aqdas (Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, Al-Qawl al-Mukhtasar fi `Alamat al-Mahdi al-Muntazar, 65)
This hadith itself proves that Hadrat Esa (aleh islam) will be buried in Prophet (صلی اللہ علیھ وآلھ وسلم) Tomb along with him
Proof 5 of building of tombs around a grave
محمد قال :اخبرنا ابو حنيفة قال حدثنا سالم الافطس قال: ما من نبي الا ويحرب من قومة الي الكعبة يعبد رحبا وان حولحا لقبر ثلاث ماة نبي
Muhammad said: Abu hanifa informed us saying that salim as aftas narrated to us saying ” There is no Prophet who has no fled from its people towards the kaaba to worship Allah, and around it there are graves of 300 Prophets.
[pg 150,Kitab al-Athar of Imam al-Shaybani as published by Turath Publishing in London]
Proof 6 of building of tombs around a grave
محمد قال :اخبرنا ابو حنيفة قال حدثنا
عطاء بن الساءب قال :قبر حود وصالح وثعيب عليحم السلام في المسجد الحرام
Muhammad said: Abu hanifa informed us saying that Ata ibn as saib narrated to us saying the graves of Prophet Hud, Salih and Shuaib [aleh islam] is in Masjid Al Haram
[In pg 150,Kitab al-Athar of Imam al-Shaybani as published by Turath Publishing in London]
Answering Objection :
Prostrating towards a grave(doing sajda)
This is clearly haram even if sajda e tazeemi , Sunni muslims donot believe in doing Sajda towards a grave as Shariah prohibits it ,
it has already in miskat ul mabasih page 161 Vol 1 hadith 694
و عن عطا ء بن ىسار قال قال رسؤل الله صلی اللہ علیھ وآلھ وسلمااللهما كا تجعل قبرى وثنا يعبد اشتد غضب الله علئ قوم اتخز وا قبور انبيا حى ام مسا جد رواحما لق مرسلق
Hadrat Ata Bin Siyar narrated that Prophet (صلی اللہ علیھ وآلھ وسلم) said that donot make my grave an idol after I die may Allah curse this nation who made graves of their Prophets (as) into prostration places (worship places)
Scan page: http://www.razanw.org/modules/sunnib…id=18&page=162
Here above strictness forbidding prostration is narrated in the hadith , and by making places of worshipping it means making it prostration place, this has already been mentioned by imam ibn e hajar (Rah) in same thread
so any one who does Sajda to is haram, any muslims who does it is not follow ahle sunnah wal jammat
On the issue of kissing a Shrine/grave Or putting head on grave.
PROOF 1
It is also narrated that Mu`adh ibn Jabal and Bilal came to the grave of the Prophet and sat weeping, and the latter rubbed his face against it.
► Ibn Majah 2:1320,
►Ahmad,
►al-Tabarani,
►al-Subki, and Ibn `Asakir
PROOF 2
Dawud ibn Salih said: “[The governor of Madina] Marwan [ibn al-Hakam] one day saw a man placing his face on top of the grave of the Prophet. He said: “Do you know what you are doing?” When he came near him, he realized it was Abu Ayyub al-Ansari. The latter said: “Yes; I came to the Prophet, not to a stone.,
► Ibn Hibban in his Sahih,
►Ahmad (5:422),
►Al-Tabarani in his Mu`jam al-Kabir (4:189) and his Awsat according to Haythami in al-Zawa’id (5:245 and 5:441 #5845 Book of Hajj, “Section on the honoring of the dwellers of Madina, chapter on placing one’s face against the grave of our Master the Prophet ” and #9252 Book of Khilafa, “Chapter on the leadership of those unworthy of it”),
►al-Hakim in his Mustadrak (4:515);
► both the latter and al-Dhahabi said it was sahih.
► It is also cited by al-Subki in Shifa’ al-siqam (p. 126)
►and Ibn Taymiyya in al-Muntaqa (2:261f.)
Prophet’s (صلی اللہ علیھ وآلھ وسلم) Grave
Imam al-Dhahabi said: “Ahmad ibn Hanbal was asked about touching the Prophet’s grave and kissing it and he saw nothing wrong with it. His son ‘Abd Allah related this from him. If it is asked: “Why did the Companions not do this?” ]We reply: “Because they saw him with their very eyes when he was alive, enjoyed his presence directly, kissed his very hand, nearly fought each other over the remnants of his ablution water, shared his purified hair on the day of the greater Pilgrimage, and even if he spat it would virtually not fall except in someone’s hand so that he could pass it over his face. Since we have not had the tremendous fortune of sharing in this, we throw ourselves on his grave as a mark of commitment, reverence, and acceptance, even to kiss it. Do you not see what Thabit al-Bunani did when he kissed the hand of Anas ibn Malik and placed it on his face saying: “This is the hand that touched the hand of the Messenger of Allah “? Muslims are not moved to these matters except by their excessive love for the Prophet , as they are ordered to love Allah and the Prophet more than their own lives, their children, all human beings, their property, and Paradise and its maidens. There are even some believers that love Abu Bakr and ‘Umar more than themselves.
[Al-Dhahabi, Mu’jam al-Shuyukh (1:73 #58).]
“‘Abd Allah ibn Ahmad said: “I saw my father take a hair that belonged to the Prophet , put it on his mouth, and kiss it. I believe I saw him put it on his eyes. He also dipped it in water and drank the water to obtain cure. I saw him take the Prophet’s bowl (qas’a), wash it in water, and drink from it. I saw him drink Zamzam water in order to seek cure with it, and he wiped his hands and face with it.” I say: Where is the quibbling critic of Imam Ahamad now?
It is also authentically established that ‘Abd Allah asked is father about those who touch the pommel of the Prophet’s e pulpit and touch the wall of the Prophet’s e room, and he said: “I do not see any harm in it.” May Allah protect us and you from the opinion of the Khawarij and from innovations!
[ Al-Dhahabi, Siyar A’lam al-Nubala’ (9:457). Ch. on Imam Ah.mad, section entitled Min adabih]
NOTE from Ala Hadrat Imam Ahmed Raza Khan (rah)
Even after above Sahih hadiths and opinion of salafs Mujadad Ala Hadrat Imam Ahmed Raza khan (rah) said
He states: there are diverse opinions amongst the scholars regarding kissing graves. It is an act which lies between two things: something that allows the practice: love and something that disallows it: adab respect.Hence, the one who does it through overwhelming love is not criticized because this act is proven from the sahabah. Though, it is better for the general public to be precautious.] Our scholars have explicitly stated that one should stand at least four feet away from the grave, so how would one kiss it!?
(Fatwa Ridhwiyah, 9:528)
Answering Objection : Doing Tawaaf of graves [/B]
This is also not allowed and haram according to ahlus sunnah viewpoint.
Fatwa from Ala Hadrat Imam Ahmed Raza Khan (rah)
QUESTION: What do the Ulamaa-e-Deen and Muftiyaane Share-Matin say regarding kissing the grave of Awliyaa-e-Kiraam and doing the tawaaf of the grave and doing sajdah before the grave (give written answer and earn sawaab) [/B]
ANSWER: No doubt doing the tawaaf of anything else except the Kaabah Muazzamah is unlawful [haram] .Sajdah (prostration) in front of anyone else except Allah is forbidden in our Shariat[/B] and about kissing the grave there are differences about it among the Ulamaas it is better not to do it (Do not kiss).Especially about the grave of the Awliyaa-e-Kiraam our Ulamaa have clearly described that we should stand quite far from the grave, the distance between us and the grave should be of four feet.
This is the real respect then how can kissing of the grave be even thought of?
(Ahkaame Shariat part 3 pg.3-4)
scanned Pages
Narrated Aisha
Um Salama told Allah’s Apostle about a church which she had seen in Ethiopia and which was called Mariya.She told him about the pictures which she had seen in it. Allah’s Apostle said, “If any righteous pious man dies amongst them, they would build a place of worship at his grave and make these pictures in it; they are theworst creatures in the sight of Allah.”
[sahih bukhari volume 1, number 426]
First thing to be noted is ahle sunnah wal jammat considers putting pictures at graves as haram and No muslim at any part of world does it, Worshipping (means doing sajda) according to hadiths and even Imam Ibn e Hajar (Rah) , there is no a single imam who took worshpiing as building shrines except some deviated people, As QURAN ITSELF SAYS THEY BUILD A PLACE OF
WORSHIP AND EVEN MASJID R NABWI (صلی اللہ علیھ وآلھ وسلم) is a Place of Worship ,
Making pictures is haram and has no justification
Secondly this hadith is stated for Christians and non muslims, And some people blindly quote such hadiths and verses for muslims
Answering Objection Hadith of Visiting only 3 mosques is allowed
Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Do not set out on a journey except for three mosques, i.e. Al-Masjid-Al-Haram, the Mosque of Allah’s Apostle, and the Mosque of Al-Aqsa (Mosque of Jerusalem).” [Sahih bukhari volume 2,number 281]
Some people take this hadith literally to claim that going to any mosque or Shrine is Haram , According to this childish logic we see
► All scholars who go to any mosque in the world to give lectures or pay visits (which many do every year including wahabi(ghair muqaled) school scholars) are doing a haram act
Now let us see what Classical imams (rah) said regarding this issue
IMAM NAWAWI ON THIS HADITH quoting Salafs
Imam Nawawi write in Sharah of hadith ‘Not to travel (for visiting) except for three mosques (Bukhari)’ the true meaning of hadith, He (Nawawi) Write: In this haidth the Three Mosques status and thier high status as compaired to other mosques in the world is mentioned, because these are mosques of the Prophets (may Peace Be Upon Him) and this is why offering salat in them has greater blessing. (he writes more that many ulemas have different viewpoint regarding going to Graves and going to these three Mosques)
Near our Masters (i.e Shafi’I) right Concept is that those to whom Imam al-Harmain (Abu al-Mali Abdul Malik al-Jiyoni) and other researches of islam have permitted for them its neither Haram not Makruh to visit grave (qaboor) for Ziyarah,
According to them it means that to go for a journey for Sawab having intentions of complete and utmost blessing is only permissible for these three mosques.
[Sharah Sahih Muslim, Nawawi, Volume 009, Page No. 106]
Ibn e taymiyah said
He said “It is also mustahabb (recommended) to visit the graves of the people of al-Baqee’ and the martyrs of Uhud, to pray for them and ask for forgiveness for them, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to do this, but this is prescribed for all the Muslim graves.” (Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 17/470)
Also Visiting mosque of Quba apart from 3 mosques
For those who still after views of Imam Nawawi Rah take that hadith literally ,
The hadeeth narrated in al-Saheehayn from Ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) who said: “The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to come to Quba’ riding and walking.” According to another report: “and he would pray two rak’ahs there.” (narrated by al-Bukhaari and Muslim).
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) also said, “Whoever purifies himself in his house then comes to the mosque of Quba’ and prays there, he will have a reward like that for ‘Umrah.”
references:
►Narrated by Ahmad,
►al-Nasaa’i,
► Ibn Maajah
►and al-Haakim. Al-Haakim classed it as saheeh and al-Dhahabi agreed with him
► Also classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Jaami’, 6154
,
this proves that the hadith of only visiting three moques if taken literally is illogical , As Sahabas (Ra) used to Visit janat ul baqi and also visiting Masjid e Quba is recommended
Omer (radhiallah) cutting Tree where Prophet (صلی اللہ علیھ وآلھ وسلم) took biyah fearing people will worship it
It states it is narrated that ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab (may Allaah be pleased with him) heard that some people were visiting the tree under which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) had accepted the bay’ah of people, so he commanded that it should be cut down.”
[Narrated by Ibn Waddaah in his book al-Bida’ wa’l-Nahiy ‘anhaa, and by Ibn Abi Shaybah in al-Musannaf, 2/375. Its isnaad was classed as saheeh by Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Baari, 7/448]
people quote this narration to prove visiting dargahs are haram as people may worship graves so lets demolish them,
Reply
Some use this Hadith, wrongly, to prove that praying under the blessed tree was Shirk. Also, to search for Tabarruk and blessings of Nabi Muhammad (s) and pious people is Shirk and it is for this reason that Sayyidina Umar chopped the tree down.
This is a great lie and some people fabricate this to suit their own ideas and Sayyidina Umar (r) did chop the tree down, because he thought the people praying there were mushriks. (naoozbila)
That kind of a silly thought did not even occur his mind.
This incident -“as recorded in Sahih Bukhari (Kitab al-Maghazi) and Muslim (Kitab al-Imamah) -“ took place because there was controversy over which tree was the one where ba’yah was taken and reliable sources from amongst the Sahabah held that that tree was definitely the wrong tree and the original tree could no longer be located and had vanished .
Sahih Bukhari Book 52 Hadith 205
Narrated Ibn ‘Umar:
When we reached (Hudaibiya) in the next year (of the treaty of Hudaibiya), not even two men amongst us agreed unanimously as to which was the tree under which we had given the pledge of allegiance, and that was out of Allah’s Mercy.
The tree that the Tabi’een were visiting at the Hudaybiyyah , in the the time of Sayyidina Umar was not the real one, but it was in the same valley where the real one was.
Hence, the real reason Umar had the tree chopped down (because it was wrongly attributed to the Prophet (s).In fact, the mysterious vanishing of the real tree by Allah (swt) shows how important it was
In the last moments of Jabir Bin Abdullah he had lost his sight he use to say: ‘If I could see today I would show you where the tree was, where the Prophet (May Allah bless him and grant him peace) received the Ba’ya of the companions”.
[Sahih Bukhari chap,Al-Magazi]
Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani says in the commentry: “Some people forgot where this place was like Sa’eed Bin Al-Musayib’s Father, and some knew where it was like Jabir Bin Abdullah”.
[Fathul bari, chapter Bay’a Ridwan]
Imam Tabari said:
During the period of Umar (Radiall hu anhu’s) Khalifet, he went for pilgrimage, when he passed Hudaiba’ he asked:“Where is the tree under which the bay’a took place?” A person replied: ‘This one”. Someone said: ‘This one”. Umar (Radiall hu anhu) said: “Forget the inconvenience”.
[Tafsir Tafhemul Qur’an Surah Fata’h under verse 18 by Sayyid Maududi].
,By building over them it means structures made over them (not around ) during time of ignorance, Muslims build tomb or shrine around it
Examples of building over the grave by Christians and Jews, Muslims donot do it
We hope this extreme misquotation of Hadith is cleared, otherwise Quran which is absolute Hujjah proves as shown in tafsirs above.
that the room of ‘A’isha (may Allah be pleased with her) – where there are graves of the Prophet Muhammad (may Allah bless him and grant him peace), Abu Bakr and ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with them)- was joined to the mosque of the Prophet
Narrated Abu Bakr bin ‘Aiyash :
Sufyan At-Tammar told me that he had seen the grave of the Prophet elevated and convex.
Another Hadith proving Elevation of Graves of Sahabas (ra)
It is established that the Prophet placed a rock on top of `Uthman ibn Maz`un’s (ra) grave saying:With it I shall designate the grave of my [milk-]brother and later bury in it whoever dies among my relatives
► by
Abu Dawud► al-Bayhaqi
in al-Kubra (3:412) with fair chains cf Ibn Hajar,► Talkhis al-Habir(2:134)
►Ibn al-Mulaqqin,
►Tuhfat al-Muhtaj(2:29)
The complete report states that the Prophet asked a man to place a rock on top of Ibn Maz`un’s grave; when he was unable to move it, he rolled up his sleeves and helped him and the whiteness of his arms was visible. Ibn Maz`un was the first of the Muhâjirûn buried in Baqi al-Gharqad.Ibrahim, the Prophet’s son, was buried next to him. .”
On issue of elevation of graves
Another Sahih Hadith from Imam Bukhari (Rah) himself
Kharija ibn Zayd said: I can see myself when we were young men [boys] in the time of Uthman [ibn `Affan](ra)The strongest one of us in high jump was he who could jump over the grave of `Uthman ibn Maz`un and clear it ► cited by al-Bukhari in his Sahih chapter-title, “[Placing] a Stalk on Top of the Grave.”
► Ibn Hajar said in Fath al-Bari (3:256=1959 ed. 3:223 cf. Taghliq al-Ta`liq):
► “Al-Bukhari narrated it with its chain in al-Tarikh al-Saghir (1:42
. It contains a proof for the licitness of raising high the grave and elevating it above the surface of the earth,
In second hadith it says high jump by sahabas (Ra) which is only possible if grave is high Imam al-Shawkani admitted that the Salaf built up the graves high as proved from above
Imam Ibn Hibban (rah)
the great Muhadith from Islaaf as Saliheen (rah) [d. 354 AH] said regarding visitation to tomb of Imam Ali Raza bin Musa (ra):
قد زرته مراراً کثيرة، وما حلّت بي شدّة في وقت مقامي بطوس، وزرت قبر علي بن موسي الرضا صلوات اﷲ علي جده وعليه، ودعوت اﷲ تعالي إزالتها عنّي إلا استجيب لي، وزالت عنّي تلک الشدّة وهذا شئ جرّبته مراراً فوجدته کذلک، أماتنا اﷲ علي محبة المصطفي وأهل بيته صلي اﷲ وسلم عليه وعليهم أجمعين.
, I have done ziyarah of his tomb many times, during my stay at Tus, whenever I got into any difficulty I went to the grave of Imam Musa raza (ra) and asked Allah for the fulfillment of my need, every time I was answered and my difficulty was removed. This is such a reality that I found it to be true nomatter how many times I did it May Allah grant us death in the true love for Prophet (Peace be upon him) and his blessed Ahlul Bayt. [Ibn Abi Hatim Razi, Kitab al Thiqat, Volume No. 8, Page No. 457, Number: 14411]
Note: Tombs ,Shrines [mizars] are only build around graves of Prophets [alehislam] and awliyas [rah], Not public graves.For public graves orders are to level them.
Islamic images
subhan allah
Imam-e-Azam Abu Hanifah (ra) in Baghdad, Iraq.
Imam al-Ghazali (ra) in Baghdad.
A scene of Jannatul Muallh in Makkah before the demolishing by the Wahabi revolution in Saudi Arabia .
Mazar of Hazrat Imam Bukhari (May Allah’s blessings’ upon him) located inside of the large courtyard of the main shrine complex in Bukhara
The Qabr (grave) of Hazrat Imam Bukhari (May Allah’s blessings upon him) is part of a completely refurbished shrine just outside of the city of Bukhara . Imam Bukhari is best known for his authoritative collection of the sayings (Hadith) of the prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him), but also authored other works on the prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) and the transmission of his sayings including a large biographical dictionary of the transmitters mentioned in his hadith collection.
Foot Mark of Hadrat Syeduna Aadam Alaihis Salam on
Mount Adam or Adam’s Peak in Srilanka… First Foot Mark on Earth!!
hira cave
Shrine of Prophet Yahya
Structure housing the tomb of Imam al-Shafi’i in the Shafi’i Mosque in Cairo.
Tomb of Imam al-Shafi’i.
Interior of ornate dome over the tomb of al-Shafi’i
This Mausoleum was built for Baha al-Din Ayaz, successor Mahmud b. Ahmad al-Qusi al-Qalhati the founder of the Hormuz empire which flourished in the 8th/14th century. The mausoluem was built by the wife of Baha al-Din, Maryam, and is thus call the Bibi Maryam mausoleum. It is located on the Omani coast south of Muscat near the medieval city of Qalhat. The city was described by Marco Polo and visited by Ibn Battuta in the second quarter of the fourteenth century. Ibn Battuta describes a Congregational Mosque in Qalhat
Roza a Hazrat Yahya (A.S.)
Shrine (Roza) e Hazrat Ali Sher e Khuda (R.A.)
Mazar Shairf of The Great Sufi Saint GhousePak MuhiUddeen Abdul Qadir Jilani (RA) of Baghdad
Imam Reza Shrine in Mashhad, Iran is a complex which contains the mausoleum of Ima-m Ridha, the eighth Imam of Twelver Shi’ites and known as third largest mosque of the world. Also contained within the complex include: the Goharshad Mosque, a museum, a library, four seminaries, a cemetery, the Razavi University of Islamic Sciences, a dining hall for pilgrims, vast prayer halls, and other buildings.
Al-Masjid al-Nabawi Mosque of the Prophet), often called the Prophet’s Mosque, is a mosque situated in the city of Medina. As the final resting place of the Islamic Prophet Muhammad, it is considered the second holiest site in Islam by both Shia and Sunni Muslims (the first being the Masjid al-Haram in Mecca) and is the second largest mosque in the world.
Mazar Mubarak A’la Hazrat Imam Ahmed Raza Brelvi in Breli, India.
Ala hazrat books twisted & misprinted by deobandis Refutation
Ala hazrat books twisted & misprinted by deobandis Refutation
Refutation no # 1
http://www.livingislam.org/n/riiz_e.html
Refutation no # 2
http://www.razanw.org/modules/worksonalahazrat/item.php?itemid=30
Refutation no # 3
http://www.sunnirazvi.org/qadiri/glance/against.htm
Refutation no #4
http://www.yanabi.com/forum/Topic209966-116-1.aspx#bm211354
Refutation no # 5
http://www.razanw.org/modules/worksonalahazrat/item.php?itemid=3
Refutation no # 6
http://www.yanabi.com/forum/Topic209966-116-1.aspx#bm211354
Islam Treasure YA RASOOL ALLAH (صلی اللہ علیھ والہ وسلم) 
